PENGUKURAN INDEKS PELAYANAN INFRASTRUKTUR DAN KOTA LAYAK HUNI KOTA BALIKPAPAN: PERBAIKAN METODOLOGI SURVEY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54902/jri.v4i2.75Keywords:
Kota Balikpapan, Indeks Pelayanan Infrastruktur, Indeks Kota Layak Huni, Analytical Hierarchical Process, analisis spasialAbstract
Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan nilai Indeks Pelayanan Infrastruktur (IPI), dan Indeks Kota Layak Huni (IKLH) kota Balikpapan dengan representasi sampel yang lebih kuat, baik secara demografis maupun spasial. Studi ini memperbaiki sisi kelemahan pada metode sebelumnya, yaitu (1) item instrumen dilakukan dengan lebih sederhana terfokus pada skor persepsi kinerja, (2) pembobotan aspek dilakukan dengan metode AHP (Analytical Hierarchical Process) sehingga indeks yang dihasilkan mampu mengakomodir aspirasi para pemangku kepentingan terkait, (3) validitas sebaran responden secara spasial dapat diverifikasi dengan lebih akurat karena instrumen juga menghasilkan titik geotagged setiap responden. Studi survey ini dilakukan untuk memberikan dukungan informasi yang akurat bagi pemangku kepentingan di lingkungan pemerintah kota Balikpapan dalam merumuskan strategi, kebijakan, program dan pelaksanaan pembangunan daerah yang tepat sasaran. Beberapa temuan menarik didiskuikan dalam pembahasan dalam artikel ini.
Downloads
References
Ariyaningsih, Sukhwani, V., & Shaw, R. (2022). Vulnerability assessment of Balikpapan (Indonesia) for climate change-induced urban flooding. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-08-2021-0111
BAPPEDA Kota Balikpapan. (2020). Laporan Survei Indeks Pelayanan Infrastruktur Dan Kota Layak Huni Kota Balikpapan Tahun 2020 (Dok. tidak dipublikasikan).
BPS-Statistics Indonesia. (2021). Balikpapan dalam Angka/Balikpapan Municipality in Figures. https://balikpapankota.bps.go.id/
Cahyani, D. R. (2019). Bappenas Prediksi 1,5 Juta Orang Akan Pindah ke Ibu Kota Baru (Bappenas Predicts 1.5 Million People Will Move to the New Capital). TEMPO.CO. https://bisnis.tempo.co/read/1249392/bappenas-prediksi-15-juta-orang-akan-pindah-ke-ibu-kota-baru/full&view=ok
Farida, F. (2021). Indonesia’s capital city relocation: A perspective of regional planning. Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan Dan Pembangunan Daerah, 9(3), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.22437/ppd.v9i3.12013
Grigg, N. S. (1988). Infrastructure engineering and management. John Wiley and Sons Inc.,New York, NY. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/7035086
Hardiansyah. (2014). Most Livable City Index: Pembelajaran dan Refleksi Pembangunan Kota Masa Mendatang (Learning Lessons and Reflections of Future Urban Development in Indonesia). Buletin Ciptakarya, 22–25.
Ikatan Ahli Perencanaan Indonesia/ IAP. (2021). Sekilas IAP (About IAP). Https://Iapindonesia.Org. https://iapindonesia.org
Irawanti, T., Santoso, E. B., & Sulistyarso, H. (2015). Development Concept in East Balikpapan with Minapolitan Approach. Architecture&ENVIRONMENT, 14(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.12962/j2355262x.v14i2.a2936
Kozlowski, M., Ibrahim, R., & Zaini, K. H. (2021). Evolution of cities in Borneo: a kaleidoscope of urban landscapes for planning future resilient cities. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-04-2021-0089
Krejcie, R. V, & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
Li, W.-Y., & Yao, C.-C. (2013). Trends of Livability in the Capital Region of Taiwan. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 12(2), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.12.293
Lowe, M., Arundel, J., Hooper, P., Rozek, J., Higgs, C., Roberts, R., & Giles-Corti, B. (2020). Liveability aspirations and realities: Implementation of urban policies designed to create healthy cities in Australia. Social Science & Medicine, 245, 112713. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112713
Pakes, U., & Subong, R. (2017). Using Android Devices for Smart Data Collection in the Philippines. Philippine Quarterly of Culture and Society, 45(3/4), 107–122. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26801327
Paul, A., & Sen, J. (2020). A critical review of liveability approaches and their dimensions. Geoforum, 117, 90–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.09.008
Pinasthika, D., Amelia, P. R., & Hardiansyah, E. C. (2019). IAP’s Indonesia Most Livable City Index (MLCI): A Perception-Based Survey to Measure City Livability Index. 55th ISOCARP World Planning Congress 2019: “Beyond the Metropolis,” 1021. https://isocarp2019.isocarp.org/
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill International Book Company. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Xxi7AAAAIAAJ
Sep, C. Y., & Kyong, S. B. (2020). Understanding Contextualised Liveability from the Bottom Up: A Qualitative Analysis of the Participatory Planning Proposals in Daegu, South Korea. Architectural Research, 22(3), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.5659/AIKAR.2020.22.3.75
Skorobogatova, O., & Kuzmina-Merlino, I. (2017). Transport Infrastructure Development Performance. Procedia Engineering, 178, 319–329. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.056
Tarigan, A. K. M., Samsura, D. A. A., Sagala, S., & Wimbardana, R. (2017). Balikpapan: Urban planning and development in anticipation of the post-oil industry era. Cities, 60, 246–259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.012
Wardhana, I. G. (2021). Enhancing Resilience in Balikpapan as Buffer Zone for the New Capital City of Indonesia [University of Groningen and Bandung Institute of Technology]. https://frw.studenttheses.ub.rug.nl/3648/
Yassin, H. H. (2019). Livable city: An approach to pedestrianization through tactical urbanism. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 58(1), 251–259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2019.02.005
