Main Article Content
Abstract
Pro-Bebaya is the flagship program of the Mayor of Samarinda in 2022. However, as a pilot project, in 2021, one Neighborhood Association is appointed for each sub-district. Because the program is new, it is necessary to assess the effectiveness of its implementation with a progressive legal approach, namely the operation of law in society. After analyzing several problems. First, the regulations have been revised while the program has not been implemented. Second, the Pro-Bebaya changes/revisions did not have a significant impact. Initially, Pokmas were formed through Urban village meetings, then formed through community meetings. Deliberation in the field is more effective in the Urban village than in the community. Third, in the Pro-Bebaya provisions some assistants assist from the beginning of planning to report, however, during the 2021 Pilot Project, Gunung Panjang Village there was no assistance, and also during the planning and preparation of the RAB proposed by each Neighborhood Association for 2022 they were not accompanied by assistants. Fourth, in 2022 all of the neighborhoods made RAB not check the standard book. Fifth, based on the experience of the Gunung Panjang Pokmas in 2020 and 2021, they experienced difficulties in making reports and taxes. Because reporting does not have standards such as receipts, goods orders (SPB), and Work Received Minutes (BAPPHP), and the tax value is confusing. Sixth, the lack of clarity on the Pro-Bebaya regulations, who will occupy the self-management team among the planning team, implementing team, and supervisory team
Keywords
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
- Black, Donald. 1976. “Behavior of Law”. New York, Academic Press: San Fransisco, London.
- Indiahono, Dwiyanto. 2009. Kebijakan Publik Berbasis Dynamic Policy Analysis. Gava Media: Yogyakarta.
- Lawrence Friedman. 1984. “American Law”. W.W. Norton & Company: London.
- Lawrence M. Friedman dalam bukunya The Legal System: A Sociology Science Perspective, dalam Soerjono Soekanto, et. all., 1986. Kriminologi Suatu Pengantar. Ghalia Indonesia : Jakarta.
- Lawrence M. Friedman. 2001. Hukum Amerika: Sebuah Pengantar (American Law: An Introduction).
- Marilang, Menimbang Paradigma Keadilan Hukum Progresif, Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 14, No. 2, Juni 2017.
- Moenir. 2001. Manajemen Pelayanan Umum Di Indonesia. Rineka Cipta : Jakarta.
- Muhammad, Abdulkadir. 2004. Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Cet. 1. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti. Bandung.
- Mukhidin, Hukum Progresif Sebagai Solusi Hukum yang Mensejahterakan Rakyat, Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, Vol, I No. 3 September – Desember 2014.
- Purbacaraka, Purnadi dan Soerjono Soekanto, 1993, Perihal Kaidah Hukum, Bandung, Citra Aditya Bakti.
- Rahardjo, Satjipto. 1986. “Ilmu Hukum”. Alumni : Bandung.
- Rhiti, Hyronimus, Landasan Filosofis Hukum Progresif, Justitia Et Pax, Vol. 32, No. 1 Juni 2016.
- Saifullah. 2007. Refleksi Sosiologi Hukum. Refika Aditama : Semarang.
- Soehartono, Irawan. 2002. Metode Penelitian Sosial. Bandung.
- Soekanto dan Abdullah. 1987. Sosiologi Hukum Dalam Masyarakat. Rajawali : Jakarta.
- Soekanto, Soerjono 1989. Kegunaan Sosiologi Hukum Bagi kalangan Hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada : Jakarta.
- Soekanto, Soerjono, et. all. 1986. Kriminologi Suatu Pengantar. Ghalia Indonesia : Jakarta.
- Soekanto, Soerjono. 1983. Teori Sosiologi tentang Perubahan sosial. Surabaya : Ghalia Indonesia.
- Sumaryana, Asep, dkk. 2009. Pengantar llmu Administrasi. LP3AN : Bandung.