Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 8 Download : 3

Main Article Content

Abstract

In the land sector, this is a central government authority that is delegated to the regions. Does the local government have complete or partial authority?. This research is normative with a legislative and comparative approach. The results of the study are disharmonization in the IMTN Regional Regulation of Samarinda City, where the phrase "remembering" only refers to 4 legal bases, while the IMTN Regional Regulation of Bangka Regency lists 18 legal bases. Second, Refeal of the IMTN City Regulation Article 6 paragraph 9 is contrary to the Republic of Indonesia Government Regulation Number 16 of 2004 concerning Land Use in the explanation of Article 6 Letter b. Third, Article 6 paragraph 9 is contrary to Article 1 number 10 and number 11, even though the provisions are in one regulation. Fourth, there was disharmony in several sub-districts in determining IMTN applicants. Fifth, Article 11 paragraph (3) of the IMTN City Regulation contradicts Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration Article 24 paragraph (2) and Government Regulation Number 18 of 2021 concerning Management Rights, Land Rights, Apartment Units and Land Registration Article 97. The recommendations in this study are: first, to revise (add) the source of legal retrieval, the provision is a higher regulation on the phrase "remembering". Second, IMTN is land that is directly controlled by the state, and it has not been registered. Third, refeal of Article 6 paragraph 9. Fourth, The Mayor of Samarinda determines who the IMTN applicant and also the Statement of Physical Control of the Land Area. Fifth, refeal of Article 11 paragraph 3. Sixth, to socialize the community about changing the name of IMTN rights and previous legal basis by submitting a certificate registration as per the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs/Head of the National Land Agency Number 3 of 1997 concerning Provisions for the Implementation of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration Article 60 paragraph (2) Letter h. Fourth, refeal of Article 11 paragraph 3. Seventh, after the socialization during the revision of the Samarinda City IMTN Regional Regulation, it must undergo an academic study.

Keywords

disharmonization Regional Regulation State Land Clearing Permits

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Afandi, Imamin Na’im, M., & Falah Ilmania, N. (2023). Disharmonisasi Hubungan Keluarga Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan. Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang, 6(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v6i1.19214
  2. Akmal, D. U. (2021). Penataan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Sebagai Upaya Penguatan Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(3), 296. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v18i3.761
  3. Arifin, Z., & Satria, A. P. (2020). Disharmonisasi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia: Antara Bentuk, Penyebab Dan Solus. Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.55129/jph.v9i1.1016
  4. Dewi, S., Fadhly, M., & Dan Asfian, I. R. (2019). Strategi Penguatan Sistem Inovasi Daerah (SIDa) di Kota Samarinda STRATEGI PENGUATAN SISTEM INOVASI DAERAH ( SIDa) DI KOTA SAMARINDA (STRENGTHENING REGIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS (SIDa) STRATEGY IN SAMARINDA CITY). Jurnal Riset Inossa |, 60(82), 27–2019.
  5. Gunawan, K. V., Mas, R., & Prasetyo, G. (2023). Penggunaan Asas Derogasi dalam Penyelesaian Disharmonisasi Inventarisasi Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Abstrak. 45(2), 212.
  6. Helmi, M. (2022). Efektivitas Pro-Bebaya Sebagai Program Unggulan Pemerintah Kota Samarinda (Studi Kasus di Kelurahan Gunung Panjang). Jurnal Riset Inossa, 4(1), 1–12.
  7. Huda, N. (2014). Perkembangan Hukum Tata Negara Perdebatan dan Gagasan Penyempurnaan. FH UII Press.
  8. Ibrahim, J. (2007). Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Bayumdia Publishing.
  9. Irfani, N. (2020). Lex superior, lex specialis,. Legislasi Indonesia, 16(3), 305–325.
  10. Maria Farida Indrati S. (2007). Ilmu Perundang-undangan 1: Jenis, Fungsi, dan Materi Muatan. Kanisius.
  11. Nasution, A. I. (2020). Keabsahan Peraturan Daerah Memasukkan Peraturan Bersama Menteri Sebagai Dasar Hukum Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 9(2), 284. https://doi.org/10.30652/jih.v9i2.7901
  12. Nur Wijayanti, S. (2017). Hubungan Antara Pusat dan Daerah Dalam Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014. Jurnal Media Hukum, 23(2), 186–199. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2016.0079.186-199
  13. peter mahmud marzuki. (2010). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana.
  14. peter mahmud marzuki. (2013). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
  15. Sepria, E. (2017). Sinkronisasi dan Harmonisasi Pembentukan Regulasi Pusat Dengan Daerah Dalam Rangka Penataan Regulasi Sebagai Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah di Indonesia. Biro Pengkajian Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Republik Indonesia.
  16. Soegiyono. (2015). Pentingnya Harmonisasi Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, In: Kajian kebijakan Hukum Kedirgantaraan. 1–21.
  17. Soekanto dan Abdullah. (1987). Sosiologi Hukum Dalam Masyarakat. Rajawali.
  18. Suherman Petrus Kadek. (2017). Delegasi Regulasi dan Simplifikasi-Regulasi Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Kepala Daerah. Jurnal Advokasi FH UNMAS, 7(1), 1–11. https://www.neliti.com/publications/72481/delegasi-regulasi-dan-simplifikasi-regulasi-dalam-pembentukan-peraturan-kepala-d
  19. Susetio, W. (2013). Disharmoni Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Bidang Agraria. Bidang Agraria Lex Jurnalica, 10, 135–147.