Main Article Content

Abstract

Competency development in the public sector is intended to increase the performance of public sector organization and public service performance. Many studies of this issue have been conducted, but competence development practice remains critical problems in Indonesian public sector. This paper aims to analyze the trend of competency development studies in the public sector and to examine the competency development of civil servants in Samarinda Municipality. This study combines two research methods. First, it uses a semi-literature review with a bibliometric analysis. The data are collected from Scopus database and VOSviewer software is used to analyze, visualize, and explore maps based on network data. Second, the case study strategy is applied to capture the practice of competence development in the public sector. The locus is the Cooperative, Small and Medium Enterprises (CSMEs) Agency in Samarinda Municipality. This study found out the positive trend of competency development in the last several years, especially since 2018. Competency development topics are often presented together with various keywords. But education is the keyword that appears most often in search results. The next most influential keywords are people, public sector, articles, leadership, and competence. In short, the topic of competency development in the public sector is interesting and widely available for elaboration for future research. Since 2018, this topic has achieved a higher number of publications. In addition, combining the competency development keywords with other keywords can produce new research topic variants and new knowledge related to competency development topics in the public sector in both developed and developing countries. In practice, competency development at the locus is a portrait of competency development practices in Samarinda City as the capital city of East Kalimantan province in Indonesia. In addition to having various opportunities from the external side, but also has weaknesses from the internal side. If it is not followed up immediately, it will be difficult for the unit of analysis to support the mayor's vision of creating new entrepreneurs in the city. This example of developing civil servants needs to be compared with practices in other local governments. This issue is much more discussed along with education keyword, therefore there is a huge opportunity to explore this topic in the public sector. Furthermore, the practice of competency development at the CSMEs is limited although it has a huge opportunity to make use its potency.

Keywords

competency development; civil servant; public sector; bibliometric analysis

Article Details

References

  1. Abdul, I., & Azmi, G. (2010). Praktik sumber daya manusia berbasis kompetensi di organisasi sektor publik Malaysia. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Afrika , 4 (2), 235–241. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM.9000142
  2. Adams, D. (2004). Perubahan lingkungan regulasi untuk pembangunan perumahan spekulatif dan pembangunan kompetensi inti untuk pembangunan brownfield. Lingkungan dan Perencanaan A , 36 (4), 601–624. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3557
  3. Arifin, Z., Firmanzah, Fontana, A., & Wijanto, SH (2016). Faktor-faktor penentu adopsi teknologi untuk meningkatkan kinerja perusahaan: Penelitian empiris pada perusahaan listrik di Indonesia. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business , 18 (3), 237–261. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.16898
  4. Atmojo, ME, Darumurti, A., & Pratiwi, VP (2021). Penerapan Sistem Kelayakan Lelang Jabatan di Kabupaten Bantul Tahun 2018 . 9 (2), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.31289/jppuma.v9i2.4491
  5. Bryson, JR, & Lombardi, R. (2009). Menyeimbangkan keberlanjutan produk dan proses dengan profitabilitas bisnis: Keberlanjutan sebagai strategi kompetitif dalam proses pengembangan properti. Strategi Bisnis dan Lingkungan , 18 (2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.640
  6. Came, H. (2014). Lokasi rasisme institusional dalam pembuatan kebijakan kesehatan publik di Selandia Baru. Ilmu Sosial dan Kedokteran , 106 , 214–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.055
  7. Cumming, A., & Ross, M. (2007). Proyek Tuning untuk Kedokteran - Hasil Pembelajaran untuk Pendidikan Kedokteran Sarjana di Eropa. Medical Teacher , 29 (7), 636–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701721721
  8. Dudung, A. (2018). Hasil uji kompetensi guru SMK jurusan kendaraan ringan di Jakarta Timur. AIP Conference Proceedings , 1941 (Maret), 0–12. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5028064
  9. Ingstrup, MB, & Damgaard, T. (2013). Fasilitasi Klaster dari Perspektif Siklus Hidup Klaster. Studi Perencanaan Eropa , 21 (4), 556–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.722953
  10. Kelly, VG, Merrill, GS, Shumway, M., Alvidrez, J., & Boccellari, A. (2010). Penjangkauan, keterlibatan, dan bantuan praktis: Aspek penting perawatan PTSD bagi korban kejahatan kekerasan di perkotaan. Trauma, Kekerasan, dan Penyiksaan , 11 (3), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838010374481
  11. Kim, PS (2002). Reformasi pegawai negeri di Jepang dan Korea: Menuju daya saing dan kompetensi. Tinjauan Internasional Ilmu Administrasi , 68 (3), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852302683006
  12. Luna-Arocas, R., & Morley, MJ (2015). Manajemen bakat, kompetensi pola pikir bakat, dan kinerja pekerjaan: Peran mediasi kepuasan kerja. European Journal of International Management , 9 (1), 28–51. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2015.066670
  13. Ogwueleka, FN, Misra, S., Colomo-Palacios, R., & Fernandez, L. (2015). Pendekatan jaringan saraf dan klasifikasi dalam mengidentifikasi perilaku nasabah di sektor perbankan: Studi kasus bank internasional. Faktor Manusia dan Ergonomi dalam Manufaktur , 25 (1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20398
  14. Omar, MK, Zahar, FN, & Rashid, AM (2020). Pengetahuan, keterampilan, dan sikap sebagai prediktor dalam menentukan kompetensi guru di lembaga pendidikan dan pelatihan kejuruan Malaysia. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Universal , 8 (3 3C), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081612
  15. Pella, MDA, Sumarwan, U., Daryanto, A., & Kirbrandoko. (2013). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi implementasi strategi yang buruk. Jurnal Bisnis Internasional Gadjah Mada , 15 (2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.5702
  16. Prokofiev, SE, Bogatyrev, ED, Belyaev, AM, Eremin, SG, & Barmenkova, NA (2018). Pengembangan profesional pegawai negeri sipil Rusia: Aspek hukum dan organisasi. Jurnal Penelitian Lanjutan dalam Hukum dan Ekonomi , 9 (1) , 234–241. https://doi.org/10.14505/jarle.v9.1(31).28
  17. Quang, N., & Detlef Kammeier, H. (2002). Perubahan ekonomi politik Vietnam dan dampaknya terhadap lingkungan binaan Hanoi. Cities , 19 (6), 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(02)00068-9
  18. Raharjanto, T., Nurasa, H., Irawati, I., & Bekti, H. (2021). Urgensi kompetensi manajerial untuk posisi kepemimpinan di pemerintahan daerah di Indonesia demi pertumbuhan dan pembangunan berkelanjutan. Analisis Global dan Stokastik , 8 (2), 178–198. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85119906554&partnerID=40&md5=e6e6e56889529a80a0f97d3dc5bdbfee
  19. Rosiadi, A., Setiawan, M., & Moko, W. (2018). Praktek Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Berbasis Kompetensi pada Organisasi Sektor Publik . 156–169.
  20. Šiugždiniene, J. (2006). Manajemen Kompetensi dalam Rangka Reformasi Manajemen Publik. Viešoji Politika Ir Administravimas , 18 , 26–33.
  21. Skorková, Z. (2016). Model Kompetensi di Sektor Publik. Procedia - Ilmu Sosial dan Perilaku , 230 (Mei), 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.09.029
  22. Sudarman, F. (2018). Pengembangan Kompetensi Sosial Budaya Pegawai Pemerintah pada Badan Kepegawaian Negara dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Kabupaten Biak Numfor Provinsi Papua. Jurnal Bina Praja , 10 (2), 221–230. https: //doi.org/10.21787/jbp.10.2018.221-230
  23. van Eck, NJ, & Waltman, L. (2022). VOSviewer Manual. Di Leiden: Univeristeit Leiden (Edisi Januari). http://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.1.pdf
  24. Vasilieva, E. V, Pulyaeva, VN, & Yudina, VA (2018). Pengembangan kompetensi digital pegawai negeri sipil di Federasi Rusia. Business Informatics , 4 , 28–42. https://doi.org/10.17323/1998-0663.2018.4.28.42
  25. Williams, P. (2013). Kita semua sekarang menjadi penentu batas? Jurnal Internasional Manajemen Sektor Publik , 26 (1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551311293417
  26. Yin, RK (2018). Studi Kasus Penelitian dan Aplikasi: Desain dan Metode (edisi ke-6). SAGE Publications Inc.